<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why airlines should raise prices further</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cnnmoneytalkback.blogs.cnnmoney.cnn.com/2008/05/22/why-airlines-should-raise-prices-further/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cnnmoneytalkback.blogs.cnnmoney.cnn.com/2008/05/22/why-airlines-should-raise-prices-further/</link>
	<description>CNNMoney.com Talkback</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 15:32:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Marie, Los Angeles, CA</title>
		<link>http://cnnmoneytalkback.blogs.cnnmoney.cnn.com/2008/05/22/why-airlines-should-raise-prices-further/#comment-16508</link>
		<dc:creator>Marie, Los Angeles, CA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 13:24:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cnnmoneytalkback.wordpress.com/?p=100#comment-16508</guid>
		<description>I really don&#039;t understand people that say &quot;Raise airfares! Don&#039;t charge for individual things!&quot; Do you like to pay for things you don&#039;t use? Do you like to pay more right off the top? Do you not budget? That is like saying every time you go out to dinner you have to pay for an appetizer, salad, main course, dessert, beverage and wine, even if you only want to consume the main course and a salad. Everything should be laid out in the beginning when you are making your airplane ticket purchase (base fare, + 1 checked in bag, +2 checked in bags, +meal, +curbside check in, +on-flight movie), but it is silly to say you want to pay more just so you don&#039;t have to think about adding numbers together to figure out a price.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really don&#8217;t understand people that say &#8220;Raise airfares! Don&#8217;t charge for individual things!&#8221; Do you like to pay for things you don&#8217;t use? Do you like to pay more right off the top? Do you not budget? That is like saying every time you go out to dinner you have to pay for an appetizer, salad, main course, dessert, beverage and wine, even if you only want to consume the main course and a salad. Everything should be laid out in the beginning when you are making your airplane ticket purchase (base fare, + 1 checked in bag, +2 checked in bags, +meal, +curbside check in, +on-flight movie), but it is silly to say you want to pay more just so you don&#8217;t have to think about adding numbers together to figure out a price.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SS, Orlando</title>
		<link>http://cnnmoneytalkback.blogs.cnnmoney.cnn.com/2008/05/22/why-airlines-should-raise-prices-further/#comment-16258</link>
		<dc:creator>SS, Orlando</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 16:28:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cnnmoneytalkback.wordpress.com/?p=100#comment-16258</guid>
		<description>The airlines should raise the airfares period.  No more hiddens fees (15.00 for one bag, 25.00 for two bags, 3.00 fee for the skycap checking your bag and their tip for ensuring that it is tagged properly).  Raise the airfare.  If you can not afford it, take the train, bus or drive.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The airlines should raise the airfares period.  No more hiddens fees (15.00 for one bag, 25.00 for two bags, 3.00 fee for the skycap checking your bag and their tip for ensuring that it is tagged properly).  Raise the airfare.  If you can not afford it, take the train, bus or drive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Larry, Boise, Idaho</title>
		<link>http://cnnmoneytalkback.blogs.cnnmoney.cnn.com/2008/05/22/why-airlines-should-raise-prices-further/#comment-16182</link>
		<dc:creator>Larry, Boise, Idaho</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 00:57:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cnnmoneytalkback.wordpress.com/?p=100#comment-16182</guid>
		<description>The main thing the airlines SHOULD NOT do is start charging ala carte.  I want to know what I am paying and what I am getting for the whole trip before I take the trip.  I do not want any surprises when I get to the airport for departure, at my destination, or on my return trip.  What the airlines are doing now is wrong and I will not be traveling by plane until they fix their problems and manage their business appropriately.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The main thing the airlines SHOULD NOT do is start charging ala carte.  I want to know what I am paying and what I am getting for the whole trip before I take the trip.  I do not want any surprises when I get to the airport for departure, at my destination, or on my return trip.  What the airlines are doing now is wrong and I will not be traveling by plane until they fix their problems and manage their business appropriately.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David, San Francisco, CA</title>
		<link>http://cnnmoneytalkback.blogs.cnnmoney.cnn.com/2008/05/22/why-airlines-should-raise-prices-further/#comment-16181</link>
		<dc:creator>David, San Francisco, CA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 May 2008 20:06:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cnnmoneytalkback.wordpress.com/?p=100#comment-16181</guid>
		<description>Deregulation has NOTHING to do with the trouble the airlines are facing today. Run a sound business or suffer the consequences of financial irresponsibility.

Fuel costs are rising, as are operational costs, and employee salaries and benefits. Remember, these senior captains are making in excess of $150,000 and most if not all are employed at the big national carriers (american, united, delta, etc).

They can either pass the rising costs onto consumers and stay afloat, or they can continue in cutthroat price competition bleed money. It is either sink or swim. It is the AIRLINES choice. 

If customers want the absolute lowest price, then by all means, give it to them. Those that can survive will, and those that can&#039;t won&#039;t.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Deregulation has NOTHING to do with the trouble the airlines are facing today. Run a sound business or suffer the consequences of financial irresponsibility.</p>
<p>Fuel costs are rising, as are operational costs, and employee salaries and benefits. Remember, these senior captains are making in excess of $150,000 and most if not all are employed at the big national carriers (american, united, delta, etc).</p>
<p>They can either pass the rising costs onto consumers and stay afloat, or they can continue in cutthroat price competition bleed money. It is either sink or swim. It is the AIRLINES choice. </p>
<p>If customers want the absolute lowest price, then by all means, give it to them. Those that can survive will, and those that can&#8217;t won&#8217;t.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank Ramistella</title>
		<link>http://cnnmoneytalkback.blogs.cnnmoney.cnn.com/2008/05/22/why-airlines-should-raise-prices-further/#comment-16180</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank Ramistella</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 May 2008 18:07:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cnnmoneytalkback.wordpress.com/?p=100#comment-16180</guid>
		<description>Why don&#039;t the airlines do a better job of hedging their fuel costs by using the financial markets (e.g. the commodities futures markets)??  It has been a long established practice in agriculture and manufacturing to hedge producer costs in these financial markets.... so why don&#039;t the airlines do a better job in using them?  It didn&#039;t take a genious to see that prices for oil and fuel were beginning to rise over the last several years.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why don&#8217;t the airlines do a better job of hedging their fuel costs by using the financial markets (e.g. the commodities futures markets)??  It has been a long established practice in agriculture and manufacturing to hedge producer costs in these financial markets&#8230;. so why don&#8217;t the airlines do a better job in using them?  It didn&#8217;t take a genious to see that prices for oil and fuel were beginning to rise over the last several years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bernard Brothman, Morris Plains, NJ</title>
		<link>http://cnnmoneytalkback.blogs.cnnmoney.cnn.com/2008/05/22/why-airlines-should-raise-prices-further/#comment-16175</link>
		<dc:creator>Bernard Brothman, Morris Plains, NJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 May 2008 15:42:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cnnmoneytalkback.wordpress.com/?p=100#comment-16175</guid>
		<description>Frank Koconis is right, airlines could consider going back to the 1920s and weigh all the passengers.  It might make Amercians eat less and lose weight. Airlines should charge what the traffic will bear until we get equalibrium in the market.  American, US Airways and United should be allowed to go out of business.  Let Southwest and Continental carry most passengers as they do it the best.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Frank Koconis is right, airlines could consider going back to the 1920s and weigh all the passengers.  It might make Amercians eat less and lose weight. Airlines should charge what the traffic will bear until we get equalibrium in the market.  American, US Airways and United should be allowed to go out of business.  Let Southwest and Continental carry most passengers as they do it the best.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Farcus, Mrytle, KA</title>
		<link>http://cnnmoneytalkback.blogs.cnnmoney.cnn.com/2008/05/22/why-airlines-should-raise-prices-further/#comment-16173</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Farcus, Mrytle, KA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 May 2008 15:25:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cnnmoneytalkback.wordpress.com/?p=100#comment-16173</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m sick and tired of the American public feeling that they are entitled to cheap air travel. I still find it amazing that my body and luggage are transported safely across the country and back for only $.15 per mile (figuring a $700 round-trip ticket). I say double the rates to push those who can&#039;t afford the increase off the flights. The bottom line is too many people fly -- period. The right to have cheap air fares is not in the Constitution. Instead, make your government invest in trains like they should and use air travel for only overseas or cross-country flights.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m sick and tired of the American public feeling that they are entitled to cheap air travel. I still find it amazing that my body and luggage are transported safely across the country and back for only $.15 per mile (figuring a $700 round-trip ticket). I say double the rates to push those who can&#8217;t afford the increase off the flights. The bottom line is too many people fly &#8212; period. The right to have cheap air fares is not in the Constitution. Instead, make your government invest in trains like they should and use air travel for only overseas or cross-country flights.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: phil macnaughton austin, texas</title>
		<link>http://cnnmoneytalkback.blogs.cnnmoney.cnn.com/2008/05/22/why-airlines-should-raise-prices-further/#comment-16172</link>
		<dc:creator>phil macnaughton austin, texas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 May 2008 15:21:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cnnmoneytalkback.wordpress.com/?p=100#comment-16172</guid>
		<description>raising fares is the best thing that could happen.  The current air travel situation is a bloated mess.  far too many people are traveling for no reason at all, and in the process, burning extraordinary amounts of fuel and producing substantial pollution.  I&#039;m hoping fares increase to the point where casual air travel stops entirely.  In the 60&#039;s air travel was an exotic sport where people dressed in dignity and went to far away exciting places.  Now it is just an airport full of rude people waddling around in flip flops going nowhere for no reason.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>raising fares is the best thing that could happen.  The current air travel situation is a bloated mess.  far too many people are traveling for no reason at all, and in the process, burning extraordinary amounts of fuel and producing substantial pollution.  I&#8217;m hoping fares increase to the point where casual air travel stops entirely.  In the 60&#8217;s air travel was an exotic sport where people dressed in dignity and went to far away exciting places.  Now it is just an airport full of rude people waddling around in flip flops going nowhere for no reason.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don, Tulsa,  OK</title>
		<link>http://cnnmoneytalkback.blogs.cnnmoney.cnn.com/2008/05/22/why-airlines-should-raise-prices-further/#comment-16161</link>
		<dc:creator>Don, Tulsa,  OK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 May 2008 22:46:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cnnmoneytalkback.wordpress.com/?p=100#comment-16161</guid>
		<description>Given the painful givebacks and/or loss of jobs of hundreds of thousands of employees in commercial aviation in this country, trying to find more than a handful who optimistically view this industry is a challenge.  Remember the railroads, American steel industry, etc?  The insistance on &quot;cheap&quot; comes at a price, usually someone&#039;s job, or standard of living.  Regardless of the tone here, price is KING.  I hear American Airlines alone is losing 3 million dollars a day right now.  Are you all really willing to make up the difference?  And that is before restoring lost wages and benefits to all those workers.

I just returned from an international trip with American Airlines and was absolutely WOWWED by the service and professionalism!  (And to think they are expected to provide service with a smile while personally having about 30% less buying power than they did 5 years ago.) Sure it would be great to get it all at Wal Mart prices, but that&#039;s not realistic either.  Go ahead and try it, cut 30% out of your income and keep serving with a smile.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Given the painful givebacks and/or loss of jobs of hundreds of thousands of employees in commercial aviation in this country, trying to find more than a handful who optimistically view this industry is a challenge.  Remember the railroads, American steel industry, etc?  The insistance on &#8220;cheap&#8221; comes at a price, usually someone&#8217;s job, or standard of living.  Regardless of the tone here, price is KING.  I hear American Airlines alone is losing 3 million dollars a day right now.  Are you all really willing to make up the difference?  And that is before restoring lost wages and benefits to all those workers.</p>
<p>I just returned from an international trip with American Airlines and was absolutely WOWWED by the service and professionalism!  (And to think they are expected to provide service with a smile while personally having about 30% less buying power than they did 5 years ago.) Sure it would be great to get it all at Wal Mart prices, but that&#8217;s not realistic either.  Go ahead and try it, cut 30% out of your income and keep serving with a smile.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick,Orlando Florida</title>
		<link>http://cnnmoneytalkback.blogs.cnnmoney.cnn.com/2008/05/22/why-airlines-should-raise-prices-further/#comment-16159</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick,Orlando Florida</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 May 2008 20:54:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cnnmoneytalkback.wordpress.com/?p=100#comment-16159</guid>
		<description>Hidden fees and such,well It is a way to generate revenue and once the word gets out ( Like it is here) then the flying public will be educated and then the airlines will have to find another way to increase revenue. Just like any other business,add-on cost more,A/C for a car,Stereos etc. Nice flooring for a home and that nice view at a from the hotel room. I think we are entering into a new cost of living structure with costs being driven up by fuel.We are being dragged along kicking and screaming! Maybe if we used our heads and used alternative fuels or power ( Like and electric car remember the GM EV-2?) then we could counter the fule costs. Take away the need and the price will drop.
Rick.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hidden fees and such,well It is a way to generate revenue and once the word gets out ( Like it is here) then the flying public will be educated and then the airlines will have to find another way to increase revenue. Just like any other business,add-on cost more,A/C for a car,Stereos etc. Nice flooring for a home and that nice view at a from the hotel room. I think we are entering into a new cost of living structure with costs being driven up by fuel.We are being dragged along kicking and screaming! Maybe if we used our heads and used alternative fuels or power ( Like and electric car remember the GM EV-2?) then we could counter the fule costs. Take away the need and the price will drop.<br />
Rick.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Willy,Roswell, GA</title>
		<link>http://cnnmoneytalkback.blogs.cnnmoney.cnn.com/2008/05/22/why-airlines-should-raise-prices-further/#comment-16153</link>
		<dc:creator>Willy,Roswell, GA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 May 2008 14:03:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cnnmoneytalkback.wordpress.com/?p=100#comment-16153</guid>
		<description>Airline should list the fuel charge. (period) Base on the base fare (220 pound person, one bag 45 pounds.
All these extra&#039;s hide the real cost!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Airline should list the fuel charge. (period) Base on the base fare (220 pound person, one bag 45 pounds.<br />
All these extra&#8217;s hide the real cost!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James, Nashville, TN</title>
		<link>http://cnnmoneytalkback.blogs.cnnmoney.cnn.com/2008/05/22/why-airlines-should-raise-prices-further/#comment-16149</link>
		<dc:creator>James, Nashville, TN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 May 2008 06:09:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cnnmoneytalkback.wordpress.com/?p=100#comment-16149</guid>
		<description>Paul, I think you got this one wrong. Since 2001, airlines have been raising fares and adding surcharges. Even before the current rise in fuel prices. Companies like Southwest, however, continue to post profits, get high marks for customer service, and add flights. How is this possible since they charge far less than the big carriers. An example, I wanted to travel from Nashville to New Orleans and checked some prices. Delta wanted over $400 one way, Southwest only $109. 

How is Southwest able to make money? They pack the planes. I have made lots of flights and never saw an empty seat on a Southwest plane. When I did fly other carriers (Southwest doesn&#039;t go everywhere I do), the planes were half empty. Rather than focusing on taking as muahc money as possible from a shrinking pool of customers, the airlines should focus on filling the planes and cutting some costs (how about executive salaries for a start).

Let me sum it up this way, You can make a million dollars by taking a dollar from a million people or taking a million dollars from one person, what do you think will work best?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Paul, I think you got this one wrong. Since 2001, airlines have been raising fares and adding surcharges. Even before the current rise in fuel prices. Companies like Southwest, however, continue to post profits, get high marks for customer service, and add flights. How is this possible since they charge far less than the big carriers. An example, I wanted to travel from Nashville to New Orleans and checked some prices. Delta wanted over $400 one way, Southwest only $109. </p>
<p>How is Southwest able to make money? They pack the planes. I have made lots of flights and never saw an empty seat on a Southwest plane. When I did fly other carriers (Southwest doesn&#8217;t go everywhere I do), the planes were half empty. Rather than focusing on taking as muahc money as possible from a shrinking pool of customers, the airlines should focus on filling the planes and cutting some costs (how about executive salaries for a start).</p>
<p>Let me sum it up this way, You can make a million dollars by taking a dollar from a million people or taking a million dollars from one person, what do you think will work best?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jim, sandiego, CA</title>
		<link>http://cnnmoneytalkback.blogs.cnnmoney.cnn.com/2008/05/22/why-airlines-should-raise-prices-further/#comment-16143</link>
		<dc:creator>jim, sandiego, CA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 May 2008 03:39:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cnnmoneytalkback.wordpress.com/?p=100#comment-16143</guid>
		<description>As more and more airlines will be consolidating, and foreign carriers are pushing hard for more US rights the problem will fix itself. Airfares will rise dramatically. In the US we have a sense of entitlement. It is the ME syndrome and it is going to backfire. Instead of whining you should be supporting your US carriers, instead of bringing them down. It will only hurt US the consumers in the end. As far as the employees,for the most part they give excellent service, despite being overworked trying to make ends meet after subsidizing your airfares. So go ahead and whine, its going to catch up soon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As more and more airlines will be consolidating, and foreign carriers are pushing hard for more US rights the problem will fix itself. Airfares will rise dramatically. In the US we have a sense of entitlement. It is the ME syndrome and it is going to backfire. Instead of whining you should be supporting your US carriers, instead of bringing them down. It will only hurt US the consumers in the end. As far as the employees,for the most part they give excellent service, despite being overworked trying to make ends meet after subsidizing your airfares. So go ahead and whine, its going to catch up soon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MCD, Chicago IL</title>
		<link>http://cnnmoneytalkback.blogs.cnnmoney.cnn.com/2008/05/22/why-airlines-should-raise-prices-further/#comment-16142</link>
		<dc:creator>MCD, Chicago IL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 May 2008 03:16:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cnnmoneytalkback.wordpress.com/?p=100#comment-16142</guid>
		<description>A reasonable price structure, based on the cost of travel would help the industry. Why is it that if I drive 50 miles to another airport, and then connect through my local airport to another destination the flight is cheaper? Ex: A flight from O’Hare in Chicago to Florida costs $350. If I drive to Milwaukee, get on a flight to Chicago, and then take the exact same flight I wanted to take to Florida it only cost $250? This is crazy. It is not only like this in Chicago, I know this happens in the Charlotte/Greensboro NC market as well. 

Fix the prices to match the costs plus some profit, just like every other industry, so you don’t have to come running to the American Taxpayer for another multi-million dollar bailout.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A reasonable price structure, based on the cost of travel would help the industry. Why is it that if I drive 50 miles to another airport, and then connect through my local airport to another destination the flight is cheaper? Ex: A flight from O’Hare in Chicago to Florida costs $350. If I drive to Milwaukee, get on a flight to Chicago, and then take the exact same flight I wanted to take to Florida it only cost $250? This is crazy. It is not only like this in Chicago, I know this happens in the Charlotte/Greensboro NC market as well. </p>
<p>Fix the prices to match the costs plus some profit, just like every other industry, so you don’t have to come running to the American Taxpayer for another multi-million dollar bailout.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bertram Moshier; Chicago, IL</title>
		<link>http://cnnmoneytalkback.blogs.cnnmoney.cnn.com/2008/05/22/why-airlines-should-raise-prices-further/#comment-16139</link>
		<dc:creator>Bertram Moshier; Chicago, IL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 May 2008 01:41:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cnnmoneytalkback.wordpress.com/?p=100#comment-16139</guid>
		<description>Airlines have a right to earn a profit, which is the total revenue minus costs.

Travelers have a right to choose the airline they travel.  Each person has the right to their own criteria for making decisions.

Airlines must raise prices to maintain a fair profit margin.  (Are you listening oil companies?  Fair!!)

In this person&#039;s humble opinion, what the airlines must do (but I know they won&#039;t) is let people compare apples to apples.

Just as many people advocate a flat tax, I believe airlines should charge for an all inclusive ticket (one price - one trip (round trip or one way)).

Otherwise where will it stop, American Airlines?  &lt;b&gt;How about pay toilets?&lt;/b&gt;

After all, I can hold it for most flights??  Why should I pay for the fuel, cost of carrying, and maintaining the toilet for my flight?

Why?  Think about it.  Many businesses today won&#039;t let you use their bathrooms and others charge you, so why should the airlines be any different?



Why should there be any amenities on an airplane ride?  Well, they started out because flights (A) were too so long and (B) were an adventure, worthy of your Sunday best.

Today planes are faster, but amenities are just as necessary after waiting through all the lines and indignities one goes through when traveling by air.

One simply wants to sit down, relax, and take it easy to their destination.

Actually, I wonder if the new air rage we&#039;re seeing might be related to the additional events one must go through when flying.  Flying used to be an adventure best savored now it is an adventure worthy of .... fill in the blank yourself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Airlines have a right to earn a profit, which is the total revenue minus costs.</p>
<p>Travelers have a right to choose the airline they travel.  Each person has the right to their own criteria for making decisions.</p>
<p>Airlines must raise prices to maintain a fair profit margin.  (Are you listening oil companies?  Fair!!)</p>
<p>In this person&#8217;s humble opinion, what the airlines must do (but I know they won&#8217;t) is let people compare apples to apples.</p>
<p>Just as many people advocate a flat tax, I believe airlines should charge for an all inclusive ticket (one price &#8211; one trip (round trip or one way)).</p>
<p>Otherwise where will it stop, American Airlines?  <b>How about pay toilets?</b></p>
<p>After all, I can hold it for most flights??  Why should I pay for the fuel, cost of carrying, and maintaining the toilet for my flight?</p>
<p>Why?  Think about it.  Many businesses today won&#8217;t let you use their bathrooms and others charge you, so why should the airlines be any different?</p>
<p>Why should there be any amenities on an airplane ride?  Well, they started out because flights (A) were too so long and (B) were an adventure, worthy of your Sunday best.</p>
<p>Today planes are faster, but amenities are just as necessary after waiting through all the lines and indignities one goes through when traveling by air.</p>
<p>One simply wants to sit down, relax, and take it easy to their destination.</p>
<p>Actually, I wonder if the new air rage we&#8217;re seeing might be related to the additional events one must go through when flying.  Flying used to be an adventure best savored now it is an adventure worthy of &#8230;. fill in the blank yourself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mario, St. Louis, MO</title>
		<link>http://cnnmoneytalkback.blogs.cnnmoney.cnn.com/2008/05/22/why-airlines-should-raise-prices-further/#comment-16135</link>
		<dc:creator>Mario, St. Louis, MO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 May 2008 23:48:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cnnmoneytalkback.wordpress.com/?p=100#comment-16135</guid>
		<description>As an airline captain who is on his 5th airline (I&#039;ve endured two airline failures and a pair of bankruptcies after spending 6 years flying for the military), I certainly feel compelled to add a few commments.

First, Southwest is a great airline, but don&#039;t lose sight of the fact that a significant part of the reason that they&#039;ve been able make money and keep fares low over the last several years is because of fuel hedges that have worked wonders.  In other words, several years ago, Southwest bet that fuel prices would go up significantly and it turned out to be a great gamble.  Other airlines must meet their rock bottom fares and operate without the same fuel hedges.

Second, no matter what your readers say, as customers, they are extremely price sensitive.  As airlines raise fares by just a few dollars, bookings drop off.  The average customer looks to pay as little as possible when travelling and doesn&#039;t really distinguish between airlines.

Finally, it may make seem like the nickle and dime treatment, but in my opinion, paying for bags makes sense.  The airplane costs more to operate as airplane weight goes up.  If you want to really make it fair, each passenger should stand on a scale with his/her luggage and be charged accordingly.  The petite young woman with a purse goes for half of the fare of a Summo Wrestler with 3 checked bags.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As an airline captain who is on his 5th airline (I&#8217;ve endured two airline failures and a pair of bankruptcies after spending 6 years flying for the military), I certainly feel compelled to add a few commments.</p>
<p>First, Southwest is a great airline, but don&#8217;t lose sight of the fact that a significant part of the reason that they&#8217;ve been able make money and keep fares low over the last several years is because of fuel hedges that have worked wonders.  In other words, several years ago, Southwest bet that fuel prices would go up significantly and it turned out to be a great gamble.  Other airlines must meet their rock bottom fares and operate without the same fuel hedges.</p>
<p>Second, no matter what your readers say, as customers, they are extremely price sensitive.  As airlines raise fares by just a few dollars, bookings drop off.  The average customer looks to pay as little as possible when travelling and doesn&#8217;t really distinguish between airlines.</p>
<p>Finally, it may make seem like the nickle and dime treatment, but in my opinion, paying for bags makes sense.  The airplane costs more to operate as airplane weight goes up.  If you want to really make it fair, each passenger should stand on a scale with his/her luggage and be charged accordingly.  The petite young woman with a purse goes for half of the fare of a Summo Wrestler with 3 checked bags.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Quinter, Boca Raton, Florida</title>
		<link>http://cnnmoneytalkback.blogs.cnnmoney.cnn.com/2008/05/22/why-airlines-should-raise-prices-further/#comment-16134</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Quinter, Boca Raton, Florida</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 May 2008 23:23:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cnnmoneytalkback.wordpress.com/?p=100#comment-16134</guid>
		<description>U.S. airlines must combine with foreign owned and operated airlines to continue to remain in business, and do so profitably. It would also go a long way to improving quality of service.  The &quot;open skies&quot; trans-Atlantic agreement is merely one step in global competition among airlines.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>U.S. airlines must combine with foreign owned and operated airlines to continue to remain in business, and do so profitably. It would also go a long way to improving quality of service.  The &#8220;open skies&#8221; trans-Atlantic agreement is merely one step in global competition among airlines.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dominick Chierico Maplewood New Jersey</title>
		<link>http://cnnmoneytalkback.blogs.cnnmoney.cnn.com/2008/05/22/why-airlines-should-raise-prices-further/#comment-16126</link>
		<dc:creator>Dominick Chierico Maplewood New Jersey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 May 2008 18:34:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cnnmoneytalkback.wordpress.com/?p=100#comment-16126</guid>
		<description>Dom from Newark New Jersey. The problem as I see it is the the executives keep taking from the employees and the customer putting the profit in their pockets. This is a self destruct plan by design. They are taking from the money makers (ie employee and customer) great for the short term but their is no long time plan to keep the money rolling in. They keep telling people that the problem is the employee keep holding the company hostage by wanting an more money and that is why we have poor customer service. The reality is the the less the company gives the more the greedy execsutives can put in their pockets. To some it all up as the company sees it, its not that the employees deserve a fair wage its how much they can take for themselves.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dom from Newark New Jersey. The problem as I see it is the the executives keep taking from the employees and the customer putting the profit in their pockets. This is a self destruct plan by design. They are taking from the money makers (ie employee and customer) great for the short term but their is no long time plan to keep the money rolling in. They keep telling people that the problem is the employee keep holding the company hostage by wanting an more money and that is why we have poor customer service. The reality is the the less the company gives the more the greedy execsutives can put in their pockets. To some it all up as the company sees it, its not that the employees deserve a fair wage its how much they can take for themselves.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rick jones, sunnyvale ca</title>
		<link>http://cnnmoneytalkback.blogs.cnnmoney.cnn.com/2008/05/22/why-airlines-should-raise-prices-further/#comment-16125</link>
		<dc:creator>rick jones, sunnyvale ca</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 May 2008 17:25:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cnnmoneytalkback.wordpress.com/?p=100#comment-16125</guid>
		<description>As a 150 lb person, I agree that if the airlines want to claim it is all about weight and fuel then they should be charging in part by the total weight brought on board - including the weight of the passenger.  There is still a fixed per-passenger part for crew, maintenance etc, so it would be something like $100 plus $.50 a lb*mile or something.

WRT these individual fees and nickle and diming, &quot;The Mythical Man-Month&quot; reminds us Adde parvum parvo magnus acervus erit or Add little to little and there will be a big pile.  And it will be a big stinking pile.

Seems to me that a suitable way, short of not flying in the first place, to &quot;protest&quot; nickle and diming would be to respond in kind - paying the baggage check fees in nickles and dimes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a 150 lb person, I agree that if the airlines want to claim it is all about weight and fuel then they should be charging in part by the total weight brought on board &#8211; including the weight of the passenger.  There is still a fixed per-passenger part for crew, maintenance etc, so it would be something like $100 plus $.50 a lb*mile or something.</p>
<p>WRT these individual fees and nickle and diming, &#8220;The Mythical Man-Month&#8221; reminds us Adde parvum parvo magnus acervus erit or Add little to little and there will be a big pile.  And it will be a big stinking pile.</p>
<p>Seems to me that a suitable way, short of not flying in the first place, to &#8220;protest&#8221; nickle and diming would be to respond in kind &#8211; paying the baggage check fees in nickles and dimes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JerseyBoy, Basking Ridge, NJ</title>
		<link>http://cnnmoneytalkback.blogs.cnnmoney.cnn.com/2008/05/22/why-airlines-should-raise-prices-further/#comment-16124</link>
		<dc:creator>JerseyBoy, Basking Ridge, NJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 May 2008 16:58:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cnnmoneytalkback.wordpress.com/?p=100#comment-16124</guid>
		<description>This is all so ridiculous because its obvious that the airline leaders have no idea how to run a business.  New leadership is needed across the board and a better business model on current trends needs to be identified and adapted.  

Really what is the difference between the &quot;discount&quot; carrier and the &quot;full&quot; service carrier?  NOTHING.  It takes me from point A to point B with my luggage in tow.

That being said, as a business traveler and for my own personal needs, I don&#039;t fly American, United, Delta or Northwest anyway so they can raise their fares all they want.  I avoid these carriers at all costs and if the choice is fly American or don&#039;t travel well let&#039;s just say that 9 times out of 10 I don&#039;t travel.  Love Continental, give me JetBlue, and Southwest any day of the week and twice on Sunday. Even if I can afford to pay more for &quot;full&quot; service, I just won&#039;t do it - better use of my money than that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is all so ridiculous because its obvious that the airline leaders have no idea how to run a business.  New leadership is needed across the board and a better business model on current trends needs to be identified and adapted.  </p>
<p>Really what is the difference between the &#8220;discount&#8221; carrier and the &#8220;full&#8221; service carrier?  NOTHING.  It takes me from point A to point B with my luggage in tow.</p>
<p>That being said, as a business traveler and for my own personal needs, I don&#8217;t fly American, United, Delta or Northwest anyway so they can raise their fares all they want.  I avoid these carriers at all costs and if the choice is fly American or don&#8217;t travel well let&#8217;s just say that 9 times out of 10 I don&#8217;t travel.  Love Continental, give me JetBlue, and Southwest any day of the week and twice on Sunday. Even if I can afford to pay more for &#8220;full&#8221; service, I just won&#8217;t do it &#8211; better use of my money than that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
