CNNMoney.com Comment Policy: CNNMoney.com encourages you to add a comment to this discussion. You may not post any unlawful, threatening, libelous, defamatory, obscene, pornographic or other material that would violate the law. Please note that CNNMoney.com may edit comments for clarity or to keep out questionable or off-topic material. All comments should be relevant to the post and remain respectful of other authors and commenters. By submitting your comment, you hereby give CNNMoney.com the right, but not the obligation, to post, air, edit, exhibit, telecast, cablecast, webcast, re-use, publish, reproduce, use, license, print, distribute or otherwise use your comment(s) and accompanying personal identifying information via all forms of media now known or hereafter devised, worldwide, in perpetuity. CNNMoney.com Privacy Statement.
Features
-
Rich nations want others to cut greenhouse gases. Who pollutes the most? More -
Many businesses were laid to rest in '09. 8 familiar names now gone. More -
The Becerras spoiled themselves with a puppy. Here's what 6 other readers are indulging on. More -
Consumers looking to buy electronics for holiday gifts won't have to break the bank this season. More
I would argue that neither mainstream candidate has a great plan to provide excellent healthcare. The only solution to our healthcare issues would be to let the free market loose to improve quality and affordability. If more qualified doctors were produced, there would be more competition in the marketplace and lower prices would follow. Any program that would allow for more doctors to be produced would help. Also, tort reform and lawsuit liability limits would vastly improve both affordability and availability
I have been a patient (victim) of government-sponsored healthcare. We had to post guards at the emergency room 24 hours a day due to the absolute chaos caused by “free” medical care. Plus the care was substandard.